The Networked Nonprofit by Beth Kanter and Allison H. Fine does a good job of applying their theory to real life situations; it’s about applying content instead of simply the content itself. For example, in the beginning of the book they talk about an individual, Peggy, who used the internet to raise money for the Fanconi Anemia Research Fund using free agents (Fine 6). She didn’t know very much about using technology but that didn’t stop her from trying and she managed to master the basics (Fine 7). A large part of her success was due to free agents as is indicated by this statement: “Her cause had gone viral, meaning friends of friends were doing things on her behalf without Peggy having to ask them to do so directly” (Fine 7). The concept of free agents was vague until they used Peggy’s story to show how people that we don’t necessarily have face to face relationships can help bring nonprofits causes go viral.
Content Strategy for the Web by Kristina Halvorson and Melissa Rach does the opposite of The Networked Nonprofit when explaining content strategy but they made it work. They present their material in way that makes it easy to read; it’s not too wording and they like to use lists and bullet points to make the content simpler. A section that I thought was important but potentially extremely boring is about channels; if the information had been presented differently I would have skipped over it because it’s such a basic subject. It’s an important section because they discuss the importance of nonprofits spreading their messages across channels (Halvorson 75). They made a nice list with some basic thoughts on what channels are out there; if I had skipped over it I wouldn’t have missed out a few channels such as print media (Halvorson 76). I’ve been only focusing on online channels and completely disregarding anything outside of the internet. In that list they also included email campaigns; I’ve been using email to communicate with my group members during the entire half of the semester but I forgot to consider that it can used to advertise a cause (Halverson 76). If that information wasn’t organized in list form I would have completely ignored it.
While the two books differ on their approaches of presenting their written content one thing that they both use well are pictures. In chapter nine of The Networked Nonprofit they open with a story about The Humane Society of the United Society moving onto YouTube and they included a screen shop of their YouTube page (Fine 122); it’s a very old screen shot that isn’t as relevant as it was when the book was published in 2010 but the basics are there. They posted their own video and prompted those outraged by animal cruelty to make their own to raise awareness (Fine 123). The picture shows that their video was viewed almost one million times and then they proceeded to explain how they got those views; the screen shot adds interest to the topic. Content Strategy for the Web doesn’t use as many screen shots but they use plenty of graphs and pictures to add interest to important sections. When they’re explaining the breakdown of content strategy they included a cute picture of a cake that draws in your attention to that section. They say not to think of it as a cake because it’s not just about having all the ingredients; it’s more like managing the bakery—it’s not just about the product your working to produce; it’s about what it takes to get there (Halvorson 21).
Both books emphasize the importance of human interaction; you can’t just let robot do your work for you. In the audit section they make it known that there are tools that can used to monitor basic information but they don’t recommend them because “if you really want an in-depth understanding of your content…people power is the best way to go” (Halvorson 48). An automated system can give you a basic idea of what’s going on with your content but it can’t tell you what you’re doing right and wrong; it isn’t going to be able to appreciate support from their supporters and tell them thank you. The Networked Nonprofit focuses even more on human involvement; free agents are the focus of much of the book. Going back to Peggy’s story, she wouldn’t have been able to raise as must money for her organization if there weren’t other people involved (Fine 7). She had people that where friends of friends of friends contacting her and saying they heard about her attempts from another friend and decided to contribute. Free agents are the ones that spread the word on social media so nonprofits can’t ignore them because they control how successful an organization is (Fine 16).
Fine, Allison H., Kanter, Beth. The Networked Nonprofit: Connecting with Social Media to Drive change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. Print.
Halvorson, Kristina, Melissa Rach, Content Strategy for the Web. Berkeley: New Riders, 2012. Print.
I canceled my subscription to Netflix almost six months ago, maybe more. I have contemplated paying the eight dollars a month or whatever it costs now but I decided that it worth the money because I didn’t really have time to watch it anyways.
The movie, Blue State, is about a blogger who was against Bush’s reelection and ends up going to Canada because he promised that he would if Kerry lost the election. The leading male character, John, was very opinionated about how Bush was running the country; he didn’t want to live in a country with a leader that he felt was doing more harm than good, which is what he would write about in his blog.
In the end of the movie after the clichéd section were John realizes he’s made a horrible mistake by fleeing to Canada and heads back to the border with the girl he of course ended up falling madly in love with a girl he met less than a week ago because that’s just how romantic comedies work, he decides to use his words to do good for the country by running for senator.
I don’t like to look back at my work. I hate reading what I’ve written because I’m never satisfied with what I’ve produced. Even as I’m writing this, I don’t plan on looking back at what I’ve written to make sure it doesn’t need any editing but I will because I want to like what I’m writing. To start I’m not going to look back on everything I’ve written this semester; I’m going to start with just a few blog posts that I can read without completely torturing myself; I’ll save that for another night.
One thing that I really don’t like about my reading is that I generalize way too much; I don’t like to get personal when I’m writing. It makes it hard to write when I’m trying to write about something that happened in my life without actually talking about it. I can’t really explain what it is I do; it’s confusing so now you know how I feel. Instead of picking out every blog post that I did generalize I’m going to look at the ones that I did get personal in.
discussed an awkward encounter involving one of the cart guys that decided he wanted to be my friend. Me being the awkward human being that I am smiled and told him I’d love to be his friend and then he proceeded to give me his phone number while I pretended to add it into my phone. To this day I still don’t know his name and, as I indicated in my previous post, he still doesn’t have Facebook. Luckily, our paths have only crossed once since then, which resulted in an awkward hello on the stairs as we passed each other.
Another thing that I don’t do the best job of is not sounding repetitive. I don’t even need to look back at my past blog post for this one. Just look back at the previous paragraph of this post and count the number of times I used the word awkward. I could have used a different word; I have the option to go back and edit out what doesn’t sound right but I wouldn’t be able to make my point if I did.
Being a part of a team to work with Jail Chaplains has not only been beneficial with helping them improve their social media, it has also helped me improved mine. I thought that I knew must of what was going on with Facebook but as I watched Katie show Geri the ins and outs of Facebook I realized that I had a lot to learn. In Content Strategy for the Web (CSW) by Kristina Halvorson and Melissa Rach they suggest getting into a group to help improve our social media (180). I don’t think they meant physical, in person groups but the concept is the same; we can strengthen our shortfalls by seeing what other do well and learn from what they’re doing.
My strategy for social media in the past hasn’t been one that has helped me gain many followers. I’ve always been afraid to post on social media because I don’t know how people are going to react to what I have to say. It’s not like I’m saying anything that would upset anybody; I was more afraid of posting things that I know are socially accepted in the wrong way. It was a silly fear but I think it’s understandable; in high school in particular I always felt more pressure to conform to what was going on around me than just being myself. So what was my social media strategy? Don’t post anything and then people won’t think what I’ve shared or posted is weird because there won’t be anything to look at.
When I think about what a social network is I always think of the online communities but neglect to think of networks as anything other than what they are online; I thought of them as something new that has developed in recent years instead of something that has been evolving since the beginning of time. In The Networked Nonprofit they point out that social networks are not a new thing; they just moved online when we “turned into a nation of couch potatoes” (26). If you keep this concept in mind it’s not as hard to think about how to network with other people because some of same principles that we use in face to face relationships can be utilized online.
We need to move our relationships online in order to function in today’s society; making relationships that are more than two dimensional these days is almost impossible to do if you’re not online because we don’t know how to handle situations differently. Today a guy at work asked me for my phone number because he wants to be friends and I didn’t give it to him because I don’t even know his name; instead I asked if he was on Facebook because I would friend him on there if he wanted to be friends. He isn’t on any social media! It sounds really bad but we probably will not ever be friends because I don’t know how to start friendships without Facebook being involved and I’m okay with that in this particular circumstance. We have to conform to what’s happening online because if we don’t we won’t be able to grow our networks- personal and professional.
In The Networked Nonprofit by Beth Kanter and Allison H. Fine they make a point of saying that it’s not hard to use social media (9). For somebody who has been using it for years and has made social media part of their daily routine I would agree that using social media is not hard. It’s not hard to figure out how to use it; the mechanics of it are pretty simple once you play with it for a few minutes. Making it part of your daily routine is the hard part; when you’re not used to something or you don’t have time to learn new things because you have a million and one other things that have to be done by yesterday social media can seem like a very hard thing. The worst part is the time that it takes to use it, especially when you’re still learning how to use it (9). First you have to figure out what you’re going to say and how to say it. Once you decide what you want to post you have to figure out how to say it in 140 characters or less (for twitter at least). It doesn’t have to be hard but it is for some people so to say it’s not hard is not a true statement. For the Nonprofits that we are helping strengthen their social media usage social media can seem like a very big challenge because they have so many more things on their plates that have to come first. Luckily Kanter and Fine were not completely wrong when they said social media is simple. Free agents are very helpful with getting the messages out that Nonprofits put on their pages. If the nonprofits are connected to the right people and their messages are seen they won’t have to do much work once the word is out. Once they say what they need to say and if they said it in a way that is going to catch other people’s attention the rest will be simple; they’ll just have to sit back and watch their fan base grow (assuming they have time to that).
Social Media for Social Good (SMSG) outlines characteristics that make a good nonprofit blogger that I feel I have struggled to have in the first half of this course. The first point Mansfield makes is “a blogger needs to be comfortable expressing her opinions online” (165). I have always struggled with writing because I second guess everything I put on paper because I’m only thinking about the negative feedback I might get. Going forward in this course I am going to try to be confident about what I write and will be passing that on to the organization that my group is going to following. Another tip that is highlighted in the blogging chapter is to be organized (166). Organization is something that I struggle with, not just in my writing but in life in general. I want bring organization into my life because my current unorganized state is holding me back;
throwing in a picture or two also helps keep people’s attention because you don’t have to think as hard. One thing I disagree with is putting in links to pictures (86) because I personally wouldn’t click on them so I wouldn’t expect someone else to so I would just keep it simple and post the picture directly to Facebook. Sometimes nagging fans to donate is something that has to be done as long as you go about it nicely, posting regularly up until Giving Hearts Day asking for donations is a good example of that (87).
You can post about events and fundraising (94) but you have to make it known that there is an actual human being making the posts so that your followers don’t get bored (95). SMSG suggests stating your opinion so that people something to respond to. You may need to try a few different things before you get noticed but if you keep trying different things you’ll eventually get a response (95). Another thing SMSG suggests is that you retweet other people’s content as well as your own (96); tweeting articles and blog posts from other people that relate to your organization will people something different to look for a change and will help promote your cause. And reply to your followers so they know you appreciate them! This helps you get “retweeted and mentioned” (97).